Skip to content
8 min read

New Updates to AI Pricing in Q3 and Q4 2025

New Updates to AI Pricing in Q3 and Q4 2025

AI pricing didn’t just “trend” in Q3 2025 - it hit a whole new regime.

In the first half of 2025, the story was: pricey frontier models + simple per-token pricing + early premium subscriptions.
By the end of Q3 (July-September), we had:

Here’s a clean breakdown of what changed in Q3 vs the earlier part of 2025 - using only U.S. and global mainstream sources.

1. Baseline: What AI pricing looked like before Q3 2025

Token & model pricing

Through Q1-Q2 2025, pricing looked something like this:

So by the end of Q2, the “luxury model” price ceiling had already moved down - but the downstream market response was still forming.

Early premium subscriptions

Parallel to API pricing, consumer/pro seats were already getting more expensive and more stratified:

AI as an add-on (with early bundling signals)

Coming into 2025, AI in office suites often required separate add-ons:

By mid-year, the pattern was:

API prices trending down; subscription ARPU trending up; and early shifts from “AI add-on” to “AI included.”

Q3 is where this all crystallized.

2. Q3’s biggest shock: Government AI went almost free

The single most dramatic Q3 shift came from U.S. federal government deals.

OpenAI: ChatGPT Enterprise for $1 per agency

In August, the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) announced a OneGov deal with OpenAI that gives federal executive branch agencies access to ChatGPT Enterprise for a nominal fee of $1 per agency for one year, plus a 60-day period of unlimited access to advanced models. U.S. General Services Administration+2OpenAI+2

Anthropic: Matching and expanding the $1 offer

Days later, Anthropic struck its own OneGov deal and followed up with a blog post: Claude for Enterprise and Claude for Government available to all three branches of the U.S. government (executive, legislative, judicial) for $1 per agency for up to a year. TechCrunch+3Anthropic+3U.S. General Services Administration+3

Google & Gemini for Government

The GSA’s public “Buy AI” catalog now lists Gemini for Government at $0.47 per agency under a OneGov deal, alongside OpenAI and Anthropic’s $1 offers. U.S. General Services Administration+1

xAI: Grok undercuts everyone at $0.42

In late September, xAI reached a deal with the U.S. government’s purchasing arm to sell Grok models to federal agencies for $0.42 per organization over an 18-month period, explicitly undercutting both OpenAI and Anthropic. Bloomberg+2TechCrunch+2

Taken together, you now have:

All targeted at agencies inside a U.S. federal IT budget that regularly exceeds $100B/year. The Verge+1

Compared to early 2025, when government AI pricing resembled classic enterprise software contracts, Q3 marks a shift to:

“Logo land grab” pricing - distribution, lock-in, and influence first; revenue later.

3. The other side of the barbell: Ultra-premium power plans go mainstream

While government agencies get symbolic pricing, Q3 cemented the other end of the barbell: $100-$250/month power-user plans.

Anthropic’s Max Plan

Anthropic’s April announcement framed Claude Max as a plan “for people who want Claude to essentially be a full-time copilot,” starting at $100/month, with a $200/month tier for 20× the Pro usage limit and earlier access to new capabilities. Anthropic+2TechCrunch+2

By Q3, this was no longer an experiment - it was clearly positioned as a standard tier between Pro and enterprise.

Google AI Pro & AI Ultra

Google’s I/O 2025 updates turned the Google One ecosystem into a stacked ladder: The Verge+3blog.google+3blog.google+3

Bundles & telco partnerships

On top of that, U.S. telcos began reselling these AI bundles:

By late Q3, the pattern is clear across U.S. players:

Free → ~$20 Pro → $100-$250 Ultra/Max is now the standard ladder for serious AI users.

In contrast, in early 2025, $200/month chat plans felt experimental; now they’re normalized.

4. API price war: OpenAI’s cut becomes the benchmark, and challengers undercut from below

4.1 OpenAI’s o3 cut sets expectations

OpenAI’s June announcement - cutting o3 API pricing by 80% - was the inflection that Q3 fully built upon. OpenAI Developer Community+2OpenAI Developer Community+2

Community posts and pricing trackers show that o3’s new pricing brought it in line with OpenAI’s lighter models, with per-million token costs falling into the low-single-digit (or sub-dollar) range depending on configuration.

Ecosystem of price comparison tools

By Q3, you don’t have to guess: there’s a small but growing ecosystem of tools that track and compare LLM costs:

Compared to the first half of 2025 - when most teams just “used OpenAI and paid the bill” - Q3 looks much more price-aware and multi-vendor.

Zhipu GLM-4.5: competitive pressure from China

In September, Chinese startup Zhipu rolled out a migration plan targeting Claude API users, offering its GLM-4.5 model with: Reuters+1

Even though this is aimed at Chinese-run entities (and triggered by Anthropic’s access restrictions), it matters globally: it signals the floor on frontier-class pricing is still falling, with non-U.S. vendors willing to undercut aggressively.

5. From selling “tokens” to selling “AI inside” other products

Another major Q3 shift: AI is increasingly part of someone else’s subscription, not a separate meter.

Workspace & productivity suites

Google pushed this hard:

This is classic bundling: the perceived marginal price of AI inside the suite falls to zero, even though ARPU rises.

Richer bundles = more value stacking

The high-end subscriptions now stack media and storage on top:

So compared to early 2025, where AI features were:

“Pay us extra for AI

Q3 is more:

“Pay us a bit more for this suite; AI is just what makes it work.”

That bundling dynamic is especially important for SaaS founders who are trying to charge separately for AI features.

6. Q3 vs earlier 2025: side-by-side

Here’s the shift in one table:

Dimension Prior to Q3 2025 (Q1–Q2) Q3 2025
Gov & public sector pricing Traditional enterprise-style contracts; no symbolic ultra-low offers OneGov deals put ChatGPT Enterprise and Claude at $1/agency, Gemini for Gov at $0.47, and Grok at $0.42 per agency — effectively near-free for a year. (U.S. General Services Administration)
Power-user subscriptions Early experiments with $100–$200 tiers (e.g., Claude Max, high-end Gemini / Gemini Advanced) Clear, normalized Free → ~$20 Pro → $100–$250 Ultra/Max ladders across Anthropic and Google; telcos resell AI at discounted rates. (Anthropic)
API token pricing Frontier models priced as premium; OpenAI still charging higher o3 rates OpenAI’s 80% o3 price cut sets new expectations; price-comparison tools and non-U.S. challengers (Zhipu) push costs even lower. (OpenAI Developer Community)
Packaging model AI often sold as a separate add-on (e.g., Gemini Business add-on) AI increasingly bundled into core subscriptions (Workspace price uplift, AI included) and sold as part of broader “productivity + storage + media + AI” bundles. (TechCrunch)
Buyer behavior Many teams default to a single provider (often OpenAI) and accept costs Growing FinOps mindset: multi-model architectures, cost calculators, and switching incentives encourage mixing providers by workload. (GitHub)

7. What to do with this if you’re building or buying AI

If you’re a product or pricing leader at an AI/SaaS company

  1. Design for falling unit costs, not today’s prices.
    Assume per-token costs for high-end models will keep dropping and regional competitors will undercut. Peg your pricing to value and outcomes, not just a markup on current API rates.
  2. Build a barbell in your own pricing.
    Mirror what the platforms are doing:
    • A free or low-priced entry point
    • A solid $20-$50/month “Pro” tier
    • A true power tier (maybe $100+) that unlocks high usage and advanced workflows
  3. Expect customers to ask: “Why is this expensive when government gets it for $1?”
    Be ready to explain that those government deals are promotional, volume-based, and distribution-driven, not reflective of sustainable unit economics.
  4. Decide whether AI is “inside your seat price” or a separate meter -on purpose.
    If you’re competing with Workspace, Microsoft 365, or telco bundles, you may need to treat AI as table stakes in your base seat and monetize on workflow depth, integrations, and specialized outcomes.

If you’re an AI buyer (enterprise, gov, or startup)

  1. Use the Q3 pricing bar as leverage.
    When negotiating, reference the OneGov deals and public price cuts. You may not get $0.42/agency, but those anchors exist in the market.
  2. Adopt a multi-model, cost-aware stack.
    Use cheap models for routine tasks and reserve premium reasoning models or Ultra/Max-like tiers for critical workflows - and use tools like LLM-price or tokencost to keep suppliers honest. GitHub+1
  3. Don’t lock yourself into one vendor’s bundle blindly.
    AI inside Workspace or a telco plan might be “free,” but that doesn’t mean it’s your best choice for core production workloads. Treat bundles as a floor of capability, not the ceiling.